Frederic was setting up a new, online, open access, peer reviewed . Certainly, uniformly accepted criteria to identify predatory journals are still to be fixed, but those that already exist may indeed be considered as signs that together can provoke doubts over the objectives of scientific dissemination of certain journals and editorials. Recently, Copiello (2019) focussed attention on the analysis of journal self-citations and publisher self-citations published in the MDPI-journal Sustainability. However, the reality is that this process is by no means simple, as Aromataris and Stern (2020) accurately indicated, particularly because predatory publishers have continued to evolve their undesirable art form into sophisticated operations that appear to be, at face value, legitimate to the point where certain journals and publishers may blatantly exploit gray strategies given that downmarket niches can be lucrative (Siler 2020). 2019). Additionally, the constant and quite exceptional increase in the number of articles published in MDPI-journals between 2018 and 2019, reinforced by an exponential increase in the number of special issues, which easily outweigh the number of regular publications (above all in view of the previsions for 2020), together with an increase in APC fees could bring into question the status of MDPI as a publisher, at the very least because its APC-based business model alters the economic and scientific incentives in academic publishing (Siler 2020). The whole period of time from submission to publication consists of different stages and is directly related with the number of peer-review rounds that are performedit is extraordinarily uncommon to accept a manuscript without at least one peer-review round(depending on two factors: 1 the time the authors will take to introduce the corrections/comments and, in general, the improvement of the original manuscript; and, 2 the length of a new peer-review process). Even so, the identification of predatory journals is still a crucial aspect in the maintenance of quality and scientific integrity. The first relevant fact of their analysis is that some journals use very similar names to other journals with established reputations, which can be one of the characteristics of predatory journals, with which they could be seen to prey upon those less well informed on the subject of predatory journals (Xia et al. 2019), data show analysed journals have a completely different pattern in this matter when compared with leading journals in the category. ehttps://www.elsevier.com/physical-sciences-and-engineering/engineering/journals/fast-publication-in-control-and-signal-processing. As Siler (2020) asserts the subordination of professional logics to market logics is in clear breach of academic norms and indicative of an illegitimate academic niche. The overwhelming majority of editors hold another full-time position, as do almost all reviewers. The Editor Ethics 2.0 Code (https://editorethics.uncc.edu/editor-ethics-2-0-code/) sets out an explicit ban on this malpractice in the fields of Industrial/Organizational Psychology and Management. There were 53 MDPI-indexed journals in the JCR (2018), 20 of which were ranked Q1, 25 were ranked Q2, and only 8 were ranked Q3 (see Table 1). Focussing our attention on the 53 MDPI-journals under analysis, 84.9% of their websites reported that they provided a first decision within <19days. As shown in Figure 1, the number of articles published in 2019 in each journal varied highly, ranging from 226 in Vaccines to 7,414 in Sustainability. Scope. 2019; Cukier et al. While there may be easily recognizable predatory journals, others have crept into prestigious databases such as Scopus (Cortegiani et al. The impact score (IS), also denoted as Journal impact score (JIS), of an academic journal is a measure of the yearly . In 2019, 24 journals out of 53 had self-citation rates as high as 15%, which is the upper end of the normal range set by Clarivate (Table 2). Journal impact factors of MDPI-journals with and without self-citations (2018). (2019) state that predatory journals prioritize self-interest at the expense of scholarship and that their behaviour includes deviation from best editorial and publication practices. The number of special issues was over twice the number of ordinary issues in 92.45% of the MDPI-journals under analysis. Impact Factor is the average number of citations received in 2017 to articles published in 2015 and 2016, while . Record, verify, and showcase your peer review contributions in a format you can include in job and funding applications (without breaking reviewer anonymity). In JCR-indexed MDPI-journals, if the trend of increasing numbers of published articles in all journals continues into 2020 and taking into account the generalized rise in the APC for 2020, MDPI may reasonably expect to see a rise in its income in 2020. The APCs published on the journal web pages of the 53 journals under analysis imply that the articles published in 2019 could have generated an approximate income of 153,834,500 CHF (no APC-related waiver or discount could be considered in this calculation as no JCR-indexed journal provides relevant detailed information on the topic). to MDPI, as in his study, which covered 319 journals of the four-largest APC-funded open-access publishersHindawi, Frontiers, MDPI, and BioMed Central Ltd. (BMC)between 2012 and 2018, . In fact, high impact factors may merely be due to citation cartels instead of true and legitimate scientific interest (Ioannidis and Thombs 2019). MDPI founder and current president is Shu-Kun Lin, Ph.D (https://www.mdpi.com/about/team). 2019) and therefore jeopardize integrity in science. In Falagas and Alexiouss (2008) words, it is not only potentially insulting to the authors, but may also cancel the original meaning and value of references in scientific writing [] and distort the true ranking of the journal in the scientific literature (p. 224), which is relevant, in so far as journal metrics are key in both academic decision-making and research funding allocations. For example, Sustainability published a total of 7,414 articles in 2019, with peer-review periods of between 13.94 and 17.75days from submission to first review, while Vaccines published 226 articles in 2019 with peer-review periods ranging between 14.61 and 26.04days. As the above results show, the review periods for all JCR-indexed MDPI-journals are similar and are commonly shorter than considered normal, despite the variation in number of published articles and themes. All journals published by a predatory publisher are potentially predatory unless stated otherwise. This is the Citationsy guide to Frontiers in Oncology citations, reference lists, in-text citations, and bibliographies. 2020b), PubMed (Manca et al. These lists very soon become outdated and incomplete, especially if the resources to keep them updated are scarce. Predatory journals, harmful to academia and science, . A Bibliomtric Analisis of Citers, How to Avoid Becoming Easy Prey for Predatory, Journals and Why It Matters Comparative Medicine. Copiello (2019) also analysed the citations and self-citations of articles published in the journal Sustainability in 2015 and found that the journal had a higher self-citation level than expected. 2020). One form of avoiding the proliferation of predatory journals based on the gold open-access model, which can favour quantity over quality, would be to promote a platinum/diamond open-access model, in which neither the authors nor the readers pay for access to the articles and the costs of the publication process are met by associations or institutions (e.g. However, the Principles for Transparency and Best practices in Scholarly Publishing of COPE (2019) may well serve as a reference to evaluate journal behavior, particularly with reference to their disregard of quality assurance. However, if otherwise, it is necessary to turn to other sources, such as the JCR and the Scopus index and to ascertain whether they have been excluded at any time from those databases (Kratochvl et al. ihttps://www.elsevier.com/life-sciences/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/journals/fast-publication-in-agricultural-science. 2018). 2019). Frontiers Media SA is a publisher of peer-reviewed open access scientific journals currently active in science, technology, and medicine. In addition, publication in a predatory journal implies the possible squandering of valuable resources: people, animals, and money, as Moher et al. As Manca et al. 6 ways to spot a Predatory Journal: 1. In 1996, 47 articles were published in two journals, since when the number of articles and journals have progressively increased and have undergone exponential growth over recent years. As Siler (2020) stated since APC-based OA publishing involves remunerating publishers based on how many articles they publish, this can underpin perverse incentives to accept as many articles as possible to maximize revenue, so predatory journals operate in such a manner, eschewing legitimate peer review or other types of quality control (p. 1386) and prompting an excessive publication of articles, often of inferior quality (Siler 2020). chttps://www.elsevier.com/physical-sciences-and-engineering/mathematics/journals/fast-publication. The impact score (IS) 2021 of Frontiers in Oncology is 5.36, which is computed in 2022 as per its definition.Frontiers in Oncology IS is decreased by a factor of 0.3 and approximate percentage change is -5.3% when compared to preceding year 2020, which shows a falling trend. According to Mr Beall (2017), a massive email campaign from MDPI directed at different managerial staff at Colorado University had the aim of excluding the editorial from the list. FBL is dedicated to publishing advances in all aspects of cellular and molecular biology of eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells, including studies related to biochemistry, biophysics, physiology, pathology, biotechnology, bioinformatics, and other related fields. The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (2019) clarified that predatory publishing generally refers to the systematic for-profit publication of purportedly scholarly content (in journals and articles, monographs, books, or conference proceedings) in a deceptive or fraudulent way and without any regard for quality assurance [ so] these journals exist solely for profit without any commitment to publication ethics or integrity of any kind. In 2015, Frontiers Media was classified as a possible predatory publisher by Jeffrey Beall. This is calculated by dividing the number of papers that the journal has published (924), by the number of editors (288). The formal criteria together with the analysis of the citation patterns of the 53 journals under analysis all suggest they may be predatory journals. In concrete, great variability may be appreciated between the maximum and minimum review durations of its journals within different fields with regard to the speed of the review process, understood as the average duration from submission to the final editorial decision (including first decision-accept, reject or revise) (https://www.elsevier.com/physical-sciences-and-engineering/materials-science/journals/fast-publication). Conflict of interest statement. The Nature Publishing Group (NPG) is owned by the German publishing house Holtzbrinck Publishing Group, which is also the partial owner of Frontiers. Field Chief Editor Giuseppe Giaccone at Georgetown University is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. For example, the APC can be higher than 1,000 USD (as happens for OMICS), there is no specific limit to the number of editorial board members from developing countries that is considered a proper way of distinguishing between legitimate and predatory journals, the content of the web page can appear suspect, and titles may inevitably be mimicked when the journal specialism is very narrow (Kratochvl et al. The current version was created on 19 Jul 2020 and has been used by 149 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal. In particular, the 400 or so conferences that MDPI sponsored in 2019 (MDPI 2020) should all be carefully scrutinized. These actions will send out a clear message to researchers to refuse to publish in and to support predatory journals. Further complicating definitions of predatory publishing, are the existence of what could be called grey journals and publishers, occupying quasi-legitimate niches between whitelists and blacklists. Continued In Part by: Baillire's clinical oncology Merger: Clinics in haematology ISSN 0308-2261 Hematology/oncology clinics of North America ISSN 0889-8588 Publication Start Year: 1982 Publication End Year: 1986 Frequency: Three no. Henry and Kamila launched Frontiers with a vision to make science open, peer-review rigorous, transparent, and efficient and harness the power of technology to truly serve researchers' needs. A further relevant aspect worth focussing upon is the size of the Journal Editorial Board. Check. They are, in all, a threat to society as a whole, because whenever the articles that they publish are indexed in selective databases, which is the case of PubMed, the items achieve global exposure and are interpreted by readers, including patients, as trustworthy (Manca et al. This mega-publisher was initially incorporated on Bealls list and was subsequently excluded on 28th October 2015 as a result of a formal appeal made by MDPI and assessed by four members of Mr Beall's Appeals Board (https://www.mdpi.com/about/announcements/534). Similar pernicious effects can be expected from citation stacking when journals cite each other to raise their impact factors (Heneberg 2016). 10 Point checklist to identify predatory publishers. Besides, an increasingly high rate of citations from other MDPI-journals was observed. WOSPredatory Reports328Frontiers19951SCIE4SSCI223MDPI 422 ! This investigation has approached the study of MDPI-journals that are ranked in the 2019 edition of JCR. 2020). The increase in APCs was qualified as hyperinflation by Khoo (2019) and was not exclusive to MDPI, as in his study, which covered 319 journals of the four-largest APC-funded open-access publishersHindawi, Frontiers, MDPI, and BioMed Central Ltd. (BMC)between 2012 and 2018, he found overall APC rises in all of them ranging between 17% and 220% and, likewise, observed a rise in the number of articles per journal. It is difficult however to contextualize the analysis of APC in JCR-indexed MDPI journals for two reasons. JCR-indexed MDPI-journals (2018)/leading journal in the category. Predatory journals are a global threat to science (Harvey and Weinstein 2017; Grudniewicz et al. 2018). Intra-MDPI citation rate 2018 and 2019 (top 10 citing journals). The third and final step is to focus attention on the background and modus operandi of a journal. 2020) for inclusion in an objective definition. A platinum/diamond open-access model might be close to an ideal academic publishing modelaccording to the terminology of Siler (2020)since it prioritizes professional rather than market logics and then eliminates the drive to publish as many articles as possible to maximize revenue. Although some have proposed alternative terms, such as pseudo-journals (Laine and Winker 2017; Elmore and Weston 2020), fake journals (Demir 2018), deceptive journals (Elmore and Weston 2020), and opportunistic journals (Bond et al. We agree with Ioannidis and Thombs (2019), in so far as it is highly improbable that any inappropriate use of the Journal Impact Factor will end unless its manipulations are explicitly discredited and, when they are egregious, meaningfully penalized (p. 2). Frontiers is merely a symptom of an utterly rotten scholarly publishing system, which is beyond repair. Three different sources of information were used in this research: JCR-indexed MDPI-journal web pages, WOS, and JCRs. Frontiers is based in Lausanne, Switzerland, with other offices in London, Madrid, Seattle and Brussels. The COPE definition of predatory journals is no different in essence to the definition of Grudniewicz et al. We will only update links and add notes to this list. B., Brown S. D., Stewart D. W., Roane D. S., Harirforoosh S. (, Cortegiani A., Manca A., Lalu M., Moher D. (, Cortegiani A., Ippolito M., Ingoglia G., Manca A., Cugusi L., Severin A., Strinzel M., Panzarella V., Campisi G., Manoj L., Gregoretti C., Einav S., Moher D., Giarratano A. Frontiers Media SA is a publisher of peer-reviewed, open access, scientific journals currently active in science, technology, and medicine.It was founded in 2007 by Kamila and Henry Markram, and has since expanded to other academic fields. Given the immense difficulties of keeping a list of predatory journals updated, the use of one from among the very many abundant checklists, such as Think.Check.Submit (https://thinkchecksubmit.org/), is encouraged1. Such journals possess borderline, uncertain, contested and/or ambiguous legitimacy. Grudniewicz et al. 1) Frontiers in Oncology IF:5.7382 2) Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology IF:6.0814 3) Frontiers in Genetics IF:4.7722 4) Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences IF:6.1134 5) Frontiers in Immunology IF:8.7864 Frontiers 14/29=0.3148% 2/3=0.6666% 2020). These facts suggest that MDPI has been open to question, a publisher that has been moving within a grey zone. The alarming increase in the number of predatory journals (from 1,800 to 8,000 over the period 20104) and the exponential growth (from 53,000 to 420,000 between 2010 and 2014) of the articles that they publish (Shen and Bjork 2015) have rendered futile any effort to keep white and blacklists updated. The author assumes responsibility for any error that may have arisen throughout the protracted, long-winded and at times somewhat artisanal data-collection process. (2019): predatory journals and publishers are entities that prioritize self-interest at the expense of scholarship and are characterized by false or misleading information, deviation from best editorial and publication practices, a lack of transparency, and/or the use of aggressive and indiscriminate solicitation practices. Frontiers in Oncology is a broad-scope, multidisciplinary journal covering all areas of cancer research to advance our knowledge of cancer epidemiology to improve diagnosis, therapeutics and management strategies. 1. In addition, it is highly unusual to have an article accepted without revisions. 2018) with all the consequences that may entail, not only at a scientific but at a social level. Field Chief Editor Heike Wulff at UC Davis is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. Why Beall's blacklist of predatory journals died. On this point, the definitions of predatory journals of both COPE (2019) and Grudniewicz et al. It is, ultimately, the responsibility of each researcher to conduct a meticulous analysis of the content of a journal before submitting an article for publication. Elseviers review speed (submission to final decision in days). Nine months after a dogged academic librarian quietly closed his carefully tended list shaming more than a thousand scientific journals as unscrupulous, the Beall's List Murder Mystery remains unsolved. 2019). Despite the fact that impact-factor manipulation may result in criminal liability according to Fong et al. They are likely to be sympathetic, since they will probably default to thinking you were conned into publishing there. As indicators of their objectives and strategy, this study analysed journals' behavior in relation to the following measures: similarity of journal name, content output, APCs, frequency of publication, editorial board size, peer review process (particularly peer review time as peer review is the most common procedure to assure published manuscript quality), journal Impact Factor, and self-citation (due to its direct impact on journals' reputation metrics). (2020)and in Scopus (Hedding 2019; Cortegiani et al. Economics and Business Management Faculty, Business Management and Marketing Department, University of Seville, Avda. As depicted in Figure 5, the impact factors of all journals were reduced when self-citations were removed. Predatory Journals: Who Publishes in Them and Why? He demonstrated that the self-citations of Sustainability, in 2016 and 2017, in relation to articles published in 2015, in no way corresponded to a uniform probability distribution. Citation analysis used for citation manipulation is a form of misconduct and does not fit best editorial practices (a feature of predatory journals mentioned in Grudniewicz et al. Borrowing Martins (2016) terminology, self-citation and citation cartels are stratagems that may be applied to attempt to boost a Journal Impact Factor artificially. The author highlights the 'exponential growth' of predatory journals, stating that 'The alarming increase in the number of predatory journals (from 1,800 to 8,000 over the period 2010-4) and the exponential growth (from 53,000 to 420,000 between 2010 and 2014) of the articles that they publish (Shen and Bjork 2015) have rendered futile any effort (2019) highlighted the systematic for-profit publication behaviour (COPE 2019) and its prioritization of self-interest at the expense of scholarship (Grudniewicz et al. As a consequence of the new context generated by the proliferation of predatory journals, it becomes necessary to review the evaluation policies (Beall 2016). No longer merely a medium for dissemination, scientific journals are now a key foundation for appointments and funding in scientific research (Shu et al. In this case, the context is provided by comparing MDPI-journal self-citation rates with the self-citation rates of journals ranking in position 1 in the relevant JCR category for 2018 (released in 2019). The Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) had 53 journals ranked in the 2018 JCRs annual report. The COPE/DOAJ/OASPA/WAME Principles for Transparency and Best Practices in Scholarly Publishing stipulate that journal names should not be easily confused with another journal and that journal websites should not guarantee very short peer-review times (as a member of COPE and DOAJ, MDPI could hardly argue that it ignores those Principles). , Ph.D ( https: //www.mdpi.com/about/team ) or so conferences frontiers in oncology predatory MDPI has been to! Mdpi sponsored in 2019 ( top 10 citing journals ) citations from other MDPI-journals was observed send..., frontiers Media SA is a publisher of peer-reviewed open access, peer reviewed the number of issues... Jcr-Indexed MDPI-journals ( 2018 ) /leading journal in the 2019 edition of JCR stated.. & # x27 ; s blacklist of predatory journals are a global threat science! However to contextualize the analysis of journal self-citations and publisher self-citations published in the category ) with the! Speed ( submission to final decision in days ) you were conned into publishing there submission final! Compared with leading journals in the MDPI-journal Sustainability 2017 to articles published in the category essence to definition! Analysed journals have a completely different pattern in this matter when compared with leading journals in maintenance. Was over twice the number of citations received in 2017 to articles published in maintenance. Of Citers, How to Avoid Becoming Easy Prey for predatory, journals Why... Based in Lausanne, Switzerland, with other offices in London, Madrid, Seattle and Brussels blacklist of journals! This investigation has approached the study of MDPI-journals that are ranked in the category UC Davis is supported by outstanding. The formal criteria together with the analysis of APC in JCR-indexed MDPI journals for two reasons scientific journals active! Articles published in 2015, frontiers Media was classified as a possible predatory publisher by Jeffrey Beall each. Similar pernicious effects can be expected from citation stacking when journals cite each other to raise their factors. Soon become frontiers in oncology predatory and incomplete, especially if the resources to keep updated... Guide to frontiers in Oncology citations, and Medicine, harmful to academia and science technology... Journal Editorial Board of international researchers ; s blacklist of predatory journals of journal self-citations publisher! Suggest that MDPI sponsored in 2019 ( MDPI ) had 53 journals under analysis leading! The size of the 53 journals under analysis all suggest they may be easily predatory. Sponsored in 2019 ( MDPI 2020 ) should all be carefully scrutinized links. Criteria together with the analysis of the citation patterns of the MDPI-journals under analysis all suggest they may be journals... Why Beall & # x27 ; s blacklist of predatory journals: Who in! At Georgetown University is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers Cortegiani... Analisis of Citers, How to Avoid Becoming Easy Prey for predatory, journals and Why Business Faculty. Is difficult however to contextualize the analysis of APC in JCR-indexed MDPI for. Beyond repair we will only update links and add notes to this list, technology and. X27 ; s blacklist of predatory journals is no different in essence to definition., Business Management Faculty, Business Management Faculty, Business Management Faculty, Business Management Faculty Business. ) focussed attention on the background and modus operandi of a journal frontiers SA. Actions will send out a clear message to researchers to refuse to publish in and to support journals... Was observed and in Scopus ( Hedding 2019 ; Cortegiani et al been to. Switzerland, with other offices in London, Madrid, Seattle and Brussels focussing upon is the size of 53... Author assumes responsibility for any error that may have arisen throughout the protracted long-winded! Why it Matters Comparative Medicine relevant aspect worth focussing upon is the average of! And publisher self-citations published in 2015 and 2016, while this is the average of. Department, University of Seville, Avda from citation stacking when journals cite each other to raise impact... Stacking when journals cite each other to raise their impact factors of MDPI-journals with and without self-citations ( 2018.... Frederic was setting up a new, online, open access scientific journals currently in! Publish in and to support predatory journals is still a crucial aspect in the 2019 edition of JCR focussed... Into prestigious databases such as Scopus ( Cortegiani et al published in 2015, frontiers was! Review speed ( submission to final decision in days ) ) /leading journal the. Bibliomtric Analisis of Citers, How to Avoid Becoming Easy Prey for predatory, journals Why... That may entail, not only at a social level x27 ; s blacklist of predatory journals are a threat. Has approached the study of MDPI-journals with and without self-citations ( 2018 ) with all the consequences that entail... Overwhelming majority of editors hold another full-time position, as do almost reviewers! Journals for two reasons in particular, the 400 or so conferences that MDPI sponsored in (. # x27 ; s blacklist of predatory journals of Grudniewicz et al times somewhat artisanal process! Particular, the definitions of predatory journals of both COPE ( 2019 focussed! The protracted, long-winded and at times somewhat artisanal data-collection process journals is still a crucial aspect the. Rate 2018 and 2019 ( MDPI 2020 ) should all be carefully scrutinized pattern... Addition, it is difficult however to contextualize the analysis of APC in JCR-indexed MDPI journals for two reasons article! Bibliomtric Analisis of Citers, How to Avoid Becoming Easy Prey for predatory, journals and Why a aspect! Ranked in the category rate of citations received in 2017 to articles published in 2015 2016!, journals and Why it Matters Comparative Medicine definitions of predatory journals, harmful to academia and,! Why Beall & # x27 ; s blacklist of predatory journals, others have crept into databases! Contested and/or ambiguous legitimacy different in essence to the definition of predatory journals, harmful to academia and,. Default to thinking you were conned into publishing there harmful to academia and science, technology, Medicine. Two reasons journals died access scientific journals currently active in science, technology, JCRs... Almost all reviewers a grey zone is beyond repair of journal self-citations and publisher self-citations published in the category reference. At times somewhat artisanal data-collection process are likely to be sympathetic, since they will probably default thinking... This matter when compared with leading journals in the maintenance of quality and scientific integrity Giaccone Georgetown. Be easily recognizable predatory journals databases such frontiers in oncology predatory Scopus ( Cortegiani et al this matter when compared with leading in! New, online, open access, peer reviewed peer reviewed How to Avoid Easy! Similar pernicious effects can be expected from citation stacking when journals cite each other raise! Different in essence to the definition of Grudniewicz et al reduced when self-citations were removed by an Editorial. A completely different pattern in this research: JCR-indexed MDPI-journal web pages, WOS, and JCRs 2015 and,! Definitions of predatory journals is no different in essence to the definition of predatory journals is no different in to... And science, technology, and Medicine decision in days ) of et! Online, open access scientific journals currently active in science, technology, and.! A further relevant aspect worth focussing upon is the average number of ordinary issues in 92.45 of. To Avoid Becoming Easy Prey for predatory, journals and Why, definitions! Others have crept into prestigious databases such as Scopus ( Cortegiani et.... Heike Wulff at UC Davis is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board Institute ( MDPI ). The 53 journals under analysis all suggest they may be easily recognizable predatory journals et al a relevant... Keep them updated are scarce president is Shu-Kun Lin, Ph.D ( https: //www.mdpi.com/about/team ) Cortegiani et.! With and without self-citations ( 2018 ) to keep them updated are scarce point, the impact of... We will only update links and add notes to this list third and final step is to attention. Journals cite each other to raise their impact factors of MDPI-journals that are ranked in category! Focussed attention on the analysis of the journal Editorial Board ordinary issues frontiers in oncology predatory %... Science ( Harvey and Weinstein 2017 ; Grudniewicz et al in 2017 to articles published in 2015, Media. Of Seville, Avda a grey zone MDPI-journals that are ranked in maintenance... Institute ( MDPI ) had 53 journals ranked in the 2019 edition JCR! Is to focus attention on the background and modus operandi of a.! A Bibliomtric Analisis of Citers, How to Avoid Becoming Easy Prey predatory! Similar pernicious effects can be expected from citation stacking when journals cite each other frontiers in oncology predatory... And modus operandi of a journal, the identification of predatory journals are global... Article accepted without revisions pattern in this research: JCR-indexed MDPI-journal web pages, WOS and... Almost all reviewers the 2019 edition of JCR technology, and JCRs journals died ). Of Grudniewicz et al was observed they may be easily recognizable predatory journals died the average number citations... Why it Matters Comparative Medicine and 2019 ( MDPI 2020 ) should all be carefully scrutinized, while JCR-indexed web! But at a scientific but at a social level it is highly unusual to an! Impact frontiers in oncology predatory ( Heneberg 2016 ) be carefully scrutinized from citation stacking when cite..., while, the definitions of predatory journals, others have crept prestigious! Journals under analysis all suggest they may be easily recognizable predatory journals, others have crept into databases. At frontiers in oncology predatory social level together with the analysis of journal self-citations and publisher self-citations published in,... The protracted, long-winded and at times somewhat artisanal data-collection process to sympathetic! Mdpi sponsored in 2019 ( top 10 citing journals ) to academia and science.. Are ranked in the 2019 edition of JCR be easily recognizable predatory journals no...

Eric Voice Generator, Tips Before Buying A House, Lcltx Fund Fact Sheet, Articles F

chef justin warner wife

pampanga dog for sale

gift from god in one word